![]() |
|
Register | Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Donate |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Very interesting. I have a few 9mm +p+ rounds for a not formentioned carbine. Have not measered it yet but my guess its close to 1900 fps based on the 16" barrel. Dave I know its not what you like, but what are your comments on this.
__________________
COTEP CCO0449 The Present is the instant flash of reality in which the ever approaching Future becomes the Past.................. The Constitution is my Caesar |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd be absolutely shocked it if gave any more than 1500 fps from a 16" barrel....just not enough powder in the little case to get much of an improvement. My Sierra manual shows a max of 1350-1400 fps with a 16 1/2 " carbine. A +P+ round would likely do a little better, but that would depend on the burn rate of the powder. A .357 Mag filled with H110 on the other hand should do 1900 fps.
Sorry for the not so great news. ![]()
__________________
COTEP #CBOB0353 Happiness is a warm, dirty gun. Last edited by Grizzman; 12-19-2011 at 07:25 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was only talking about hand gun ballistics.. I really never had an interest in 9mm 16" rifles.. I guess the +P+ ammo was designed for rifles right? Anyway I was looking at a bunch of slow motion Gel tests on all kinds of ammo on youtube and you can really see the difference in shock from .380 to 9mm to 357 to 44 -223-30/06 all the way to .50bmg... some of the new 9mm is quite respectable.. look for the slow motion ones
Heres the 45acp hard ball I think and 45acp SD 357mag and 9mm
__________________
Drag not your strength from government but from the voices they abuse COTEP #236 Last edited by zenfly; 12-20-2011 at 04:22 PM. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
OK,
![]()
__________________
canis fidelis cave canem, vereor non magnus nocens lupus In hoc signo vinces If you can list them, you ain't got enough!!! Life Member NRA, SCI, ATA, NSCA COTEP 414 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is why I shoot
![]()
__________________
Drag not your strength from government but from the voices they abuse COTEP #236 |
#6
|
![]()
Sheepdogs' wet-dream aside, most Semi-auto rounds do poorly in long barrels. Example; WWB FMJ,230grain. In my rock it does 835fps ave.velocity, in a friends' Thompson Semi-auto SMG with a 16-1/2" barrel it does 785fps. Same would happen with a 9mm of any type. 9mm is designed to give max velocity in a 4" barreled gun so, that means a fast-burning powder. Now, if all that powder burns in say, the first five-inches of the Thompsons'Barrel, it has to overcome the friction of the next eleven-inches of barrel as the gas-pressure drops off rapidly. Result? Naturally, the bullet slows down inside the barrel. Actually, you would lose more velocity in the barrel with the 9mm because it has half the mass so, it will lose momentum faster.
Okay, they drive a 115grain bullet at 357magnum velocities and get what? .60caliber? That's considered good? Most of the better 230grain 45ACP SD loads will expand to past .70caliber at 850 or so fps. Remember now, that's twice the 115s weight. And they will still completely penetrate a torso. Guys, instead of trying to find the Velocity-King, you should be concentrating way more on Shot-Placement. A good hit with a 38Spl. beats a poor hit with a 44magnum.
__________________
Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas COTEP#CBOB0428 NRA,GCA,OGCA, USAF,Msgt.(Ret.) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |