COTEP.org  
Register Forums Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Donate

Go Back   COTEP.org > Main Category > Main Forum
Reload this Page Nuclear "Fudds..."

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2016, 09:04 AM
BlackKnight's Avatar
BlackKnight BlackKnight is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
  
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: 940
Thanked 887 Times in 167 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitor View Post
For me it's simple. The key word is BEAR. It's my belief the founding fathers wanted the people to be able to keep and CARRY the same INFANTRY weapons the armed forces of the time possessed.

And so, in line with that thought, I wholeheartedly believe that any modern infantry weapon, a weapon that can be effectively carried by a person, it's protected by the 2A.
This is along my line of thinking as well.
__________________

Professionals talk about tactics and concepts while amateurs talk about gear and equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2016, 01:22 PM
Riverpigusmc's Avatar
Riverpigusmc Riverpigusmc is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Archer, Florida CSA
Posts: 13,002
Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 1,963
Thanked 3,495 Times in 720 Posts
Default
I'll be happy with a few LAAW's and a more or two. Perhaps a few frags for those quick "f*** you" moments
__________________
NRA Life Member
Wilson Combat CQB
Kimber Tactical Pro II
S&W J-Frame .38
ect
" I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever "

There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name...
COTEP #523
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2016, 01:50 PM
TLE2's Avatar
TLE2 TLE2 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Near Okahoma City
Posts: 2,831
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 547
Thanked 379 Times in 83 Posts
Default
Not really interested in ICBMs or Cruise Missles, but a SAW and a Dillon mini would go far to make me feel more secure.
__________________

COTEP #719

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one." - Thomas Jefferson quoting Cesare Beccaria
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2016, 02:05 PM
skosh69's Avatar
skosh69 skosh69 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 11,000
Thanks: 2,242
Thanked 4,520 Times in 1,212 Posts
Default
I'd be happy with a M1A1 Abrams tank.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2016, 04:33 PM
FfNJGTFO's Avatar
FfNJGTFO FfNJGTFO is offline
COTEP Member
  
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 1,522
Thanked 207 Times in 72 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitor View Post
For me it's simple. The key word is BEAR. It's my belief the founding fathers wanted the people to be able to keep and CARRY the same INFANTRY weapons the armed forces of the time possessed.

And so, in line with that thought, I wholeheartedly believe that any modern infantry weapon, a weapon that can be effectively carried by a person, it's protected by the 2A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackKnight View Post
This is along my line of thinking as well.
The thing is, Stingers and other like SMAWs can be "effectively carried" by a person...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2016, 04:35 PM
Riverpigusmc's Avatar
Riverpigusmc Riverpigusmc is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Archer, Florida CSA
Posts: 13,002
Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 1,963
Thanked 3,495 Times in 720 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by FfNJGTFO View Post
The thing is, Stingers and other like SMAWs can be "effectively carried" by a person...
And carry them I would
__________________
NRA Life Member
Wilson Combat CQB
Kimber Tactical Pro II
S&W J-Frame .38
ect
" I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever "

There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name...
COTEP #523
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2016, 04:53 PM
BlackKnight's Avatar
BlackKnight BlackKnight is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
  
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: 940
Thanked 887 Times in 167 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by FfNJGTFO View Post
The thing is, Stingers and other like SMAWs can be "effectively carried" by a person...
Then I want a flamethrower.
__________________

Professionals talk about tactics and concepts while amateurs talk about gear and equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2016, 11:31 PM
Gatorade's Avatar
Gatorade Gatorade is offline
COTEP Member
  
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 802
Thanked 643 Times in 156 Posts
Default
If I had a rocket launcher!
__________________
CBOB0746
NRA Life Member
Florida CWL Since 1992
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2016, 11:46 PM
pitor's Avatar
pitor pitor is offline
COTEP Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,877
Thanks: 148
Thanked 282 Times in 52 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by FfNJGTFO View Post
The thing is, Stingers and other like SMAWs can be "effectively carried" by a person...
But you're forgetting "Infantry Weapon". But in all honesty if you can carry a stinger, why not? Good luck affording one, but alas...
__________________
Pedro U / Member# 0770
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Contact Us - COTEP.org - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.