|
|
| Register | Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Donate |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
#1
02-07-2014, 07:46 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Ill prob get flamed for saying this....but the manual of arms is the same for the 42,the19 or any other
 . That would be point one for me. Second....after what ive seen in the light pocket pistol market...i.e. Ruger...and a couple other plastics....i think this 42 wil probably outshoot most if not all. But yes......for me?....if i want a 380in my pocket.....im carrying my colt mustang 2.Just saying..... Dafadda
__________________
COTEP: CBOB578 DW CCO SIG GSR 1911 SA Micro Compact and a spectacular cast of others! "You have never lived, until you have almost died. And for those who fight for it, life has a flavor that the protected will never know." Guy de Maupassant, 1893. Anonymously, penned on a sign at a command post at Khe Sanh, RVN. 
|
|
#2
12-28-2014, 09:26 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The problem for me....
....is that I don't want a .380 in my pocket. I really don't want a gun in my pocket for that matter. It seems there is a matter of diminishing returns as the pocket guns get smaller and the calibers go with it.
I wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of any firearm, but .380 just doesn't seem to be enough to depend on. Neither does 9mm Makarov. If I were to carry a smaller gun, I would want nothing less than 9mm. I'm also not fond of polymer, but I can understand the issue of weight. I assume the 42 has the same design as the other Glocks rather than the stationary barrel for most other .380s That would be a plus. How about a Walther PPS in 9mm?
__________________
COTEP CBOB #289 "Deserve's got nothing to do with it".
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Hybrid Mode